22nd European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
(ECCMID)

31.03.2012 - 03.04.2012
1. Please select a day:
31.03.2012
01.04.2012
02.04.2012
03.04.2012
Publication only
Search

Personal programme
Please enter your email address here in order to bring up your personal programme




Home - 01.04.2012 - New antimicrobial agents against old and new protein targets


New antimicrobial agents against old and new protein targets

Sunday, April 01, 2012, 13:30 - 14:30

In vitro activity of solithromycin (CEM-101) against clinical Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates displaying various types of antimicrobial resistance profiles

D. Golparian*, P. Fernandes, M. Ohnishi, J.S Jensen, M. Unemo (Írebro, SE; Chapel Hill, US; Tokyo, JP; Copenhagen, DK)

Objectives: Resistance in N. gonorrhoeae to penicillins, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and early-generation cephalosporins are today common worldwide. Recently, clinical resistance to the currently recommended cefixime and ceftriaxone has been reported. Accordingly, gonorrhoea may become untreatable and the search for new treatment options for gonorrhoea is essential. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of the newly developed fluoroketolide, solithromycin (CEM-101), compared to other antimicrobials previously recommended for treatment of gonorrhoea.
Methods: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of solithromycin, azithromycin, erythromycin, telithromycin, spectinomycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, ampicillin, cefixime, and ceftriaxone was determined using agar dilution method and Etest for a collection of 250 clinical N. gonorrhoeae isolates with various antimicrobial resistance genotypes and phenotypes. These included the recently described first extensively drug resistant (XDR) N. gonorrhoeae strain H041, other strains displaying clinical ESC resistance, and strains with other types of multi-drug clinical resistance.
Results: The MIC range of solithromycin was 0.001-32 mg/L (MIC50: 0.125 mg/L and MIC90: 0.5 mg/L). Ninety-three isolates had an azithromycin MIC >0.5 mg/L. However, only six isolates had a solithromycin MIC >0.5 mg/L (1, 4, 4, 4, 16, and 32 mg/L). The corresponding MICs of azithromycin for these isolates were 2, 4, 8, >256, >256 and >256 mg/L, respectively. The antimicrobial activity of solithromycin was significantly superior to those of azithromycin, other macrolides, as well as other classes of antimicrobials.
Conclusion: The present in vitro observations regarding the efficacy of solithromycin against N. gonorrhoeae suggest that this new fluoroketolide could be an appropriate alternative to the currently recommended ESCs for treatment of gonorrhoea. It is of great importance to perform further in vitro studies regarding, e.g., selection of resistance and mechanisms of solithromycin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae. Furthermore, previous small studies have indicated that solithromycin has high potency against mycoplasmas, ureaplasmas, and Chlamydia trachomatis, suggesting that solithromycin might be an appropriate option for treatment of several sexual transmitted infections (STIs). Nevertheless, larger, well-designed studies examining these STI pathogens are crucial.